In an unexpected show of support, broadcaster Richard Keys has defended Premier League referee David Coote, who was recently suspended amid serious allegations.
The Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), the body responsible for officiating in English football, announced Coote’s suspension after a video surfaced showing him making derogatory comments about Liverpool manager Jurgen Klopp and the club itself. In the video, Coote allegedly referred to Klopp as a ‘German ****’ and dismissed Liverpool with a crude insult.
This incident quickly snowballed into a further controversy when another video emerged showing a man, allegedly Coote, snorting a white powder in a hotel room during the Euro 2020 tournament last summer. The eight-second clip, leaked to the media and published by The Sun, showed the individual using a rolled-up banknote to inhale the substance, leading to further scrutiny of Coote’s conduct while officiating in one of the continent’s most prestigious tournaments.
In the face of these troubling revelations, Richard Keys has called for a “full and transparent investigation” into the matter. In his blog, Keys highlighted the need for a measured response to the situation, drawing parallels to his own career at Sky Sports. Back in 2011, Keys and his colleague Andy Gray were forced to leave their roles after a series of sexist comments were leaked.
While Keys acknowledged the severity of Coote’s actions, he was firm in his belief that the referee should not be permanently condemned. “Clearly, Coote can’t referee again in the Premier League,” Keys wrote, “but to destroy his life over this would be wrong. Right now, he’s in a very dark place. Tick. I’ve been there.”
This compassionate stance from Keys underscores the importance of considering mental health and well-being in the decision-making process. Keys advocated for Coote’s potential return to officiating, but at a lower level of the game. “I don’t see any reason why he shouldn’t continue with his job in the EFL,” Keys added, referencing England’s lower divisions, where the pressure and scrutiny on referees are less intense compared to the Premier League. He argued that if football truly believes in supporting “well-being and mental health,” it must offer Coote a path forward after serving his punishment.
However, Keys emphasized that this would only be a viable option if Coote’s personal struggles do not worsen. He was clear that the referee’s return to officiating should depend on the outcomes of the ongoing investigation and his mental health. The ultimate goal, according to Keys, should be to offer Coote a chance at redemption, provided he demonstrates the ability to overcome his personal issues.
The question of accountability, however, remains complex. Many fans have voiced their concerns over the quality of Coote’s refereeing, with some suggesting his past decisions have been influenced by bias against Liverpool. While Keys acknowledged some of the controversial calls made during Liverpool’s matches, he rejected the notion that Coote had acted out of malice or bias. According to Keys, the problems were more a result of Coote’s lack of refereeing quality rather than any personal vendetta against the Merseyside club.
Advertisement
We’re on Social Media
Follow us on X
See more football highlights
“Some of the incidents Coote missed in Liverpool matches were outrageous,” Keys stated. “But that’s because he isn’t a very good referee—not because he’s biased.” He continued by criticizing the PGMOL for failing to take responsibility for poor officiating and instead offering excuses for subpar performances. Keys argued that transparency is key for the organization to regain the trust of fans and the broader football community.
Looking ahead, Keys also called for broader reforms in the officiating system, particularly regarding drug testing. In light of the recent videos, he argued that referees should undergo random drug testing moving forward to ensure such incidents do not occur again. “The videos of Coote must now lead to referees being randomly drug-tested going forward,” Keys wrote, stressing the importance of maintaining integrity and trust within the officiating ranks.
While the scandal surrounding Coote is certainly a blemish on his career, Keys’ backing of the referee draws attention to the need for a nuanced approach to punishment and rehabilitation. It’s clear that football, like other industries, must balance accountability with empathy, especially when the individual at the center of the storm is struggling with personal demons.
In his blog, Keys pointed to the case of Bobby Madley as a potential model for Coote’s future. Madley was sacked in 2018 after sending a video in which he mocked a disabled person. However, after a brief period of exile in Norway, Madley was given a second chance, returning to officiating in the English Football League (EFL) in 2020. His performances in the lower leagues earned him a return to the Premier League in 2022, showing that a referee can be rehabilitated and restored to the top level if they demonstrate growth and professionalism.
For Coote, this example may offer a glimmer of hope. The key takeaway from Keys’ stance is that even in the face of serious allegations, individuals should not be written off entirely. Instead, they should be given a fair opportunity to learn from their mistakes, address their issues, and rebuild their careers.
It’s unlikely that Coote will officiate in the Premier League again anytime soon, but his future in football does not have to be defined by one misstep. Football must embrace a philosophy of redemption, giving its referees the tools they need to rebuild their lives and careers after personal failings. While the road to recovery may be long and difficult, Richard Keys’ support for Coote highlights the importance of second chances, and the hope that football can lead by example when it comes to forgiveness and personal growth.