Arsenal had the opportunity to sign Ollie Watkins for around £60 million this January, but the move ultimately never materialized.
The Aston Villa striker, who has been in fine form this season, was reportedly keen on the switch to the Emirates, yet the Gunners fell short of meeting the financial demands set by Villa. According to The Athletic, Arsenal initially tabled a £40m bid for Watkins, a player highly admired by Mikel Arteta. However, internal disagreements within the club hierarchy prevented them from increasing their offer to match Villa’s valuation.
With Watkins being a boyhood Arsenal fan, a move to north London might have been an emotional and career-defining step. The Gunners, in dire need of a clinical striker, could have benefited significantly from his ability to link up play and finish chances with precision. However, Villa’s decision to sell Jhon Duran to Al Nassr effectively shut the door on any further negotiations. Once that deal was completed, Unai Emery’s side no longer had the financial necessity to consider parting ways with Watkins, leaving Arsenal to rue a missed opportunity.
The failure to land Watkins this winter now shifts Arsenal’s focus towards the summer transfer window, where the market dynamics could be more favorable. While the 29-year-old might have been a solid short-term option, his age and price tag raised concerns over long-term value. Arsenal’s recruitment team will likely explore younger alternatives who can provide a long-term solution to their goal-scoring woes. This strategic approach suggests they might be targeting a more sustainable investment rather than a quick fix.
Advertisement
Latest Press Conference
We’re on Social Media
There’s no doubt Watkins would have brought immediate quality to Arsenal’s frontline, especially given their struggles in converting chances this season. His versatility, movement, and finishing ability have made him one of the standout strikers in the Premier League. Despite this, Arsenal’s reluctance to meet Villa’s financial demands indicates they are carefully weighing their options rather than making a reactionary signing.
From Watkins’ perspective, this development is undoubtedly disappointing, as it likely represents a lost chance to play for the club he grew up supporting. However, his importance to Villa remains undeniable, and under Emery’s guidance, he continues to play a pivotal role in their push for European football. With Villa thriving this season, Watkins may find himself competing in elite continental competitions with his current club rather than waiting for another Arsenal approach.
Ultimately, Arsenal’s decision to pass on Watkins could either prove to be a wise financial move or a costly mistake, depending on how their summer striker pursuit unfolds. While his Premier League experience and goal-scoring prowess would have been valuable, the Gunners may believe that a younger, more long-term solution will offer better value. Time will tell whether this was a chance missed or a strategic step toward a bigger summer signing.
